![]() ![]() “until human disease is a thing of the past, we cannot support laws that put helium supplies at risk.” this restates the claim of this argument, which is that we should do everything in our power to treat human diseases. “these laws are unlikely to change, so we must take steps to manufacture helium on our own.” this statement makes the logical leap that if we can't recycle helium, we should create it. which statement would be the most appropriate in a conclusion to this argument? why? a. for the sake of our health, those laws must change. yet current laws make recycling helium unprofitable. helium also has heart and nerve protective properties, and doctors are beginning to use it in surgery. it can be used for a variety of medical purposes, including the treatment of breathing problems such as asthma. although helium is in low supply, the demand for it is quite high. ![]() most helium comes either from mining minerals or as a byproduct of natural gas. Rick read the following argument: although the gas helium is the second most abundant element in the known universe, its supplies on earth are limited. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |